EExcel 丞燕快速查詢2

EExcel 丞燕快速查詢2
EExcel 丞燕快速查詢2 https://sandk.ffbizs.com/

【事實釐清】媒體報導「歐盟主要成員國近日同意將核能納入『綠色轉型』,成為解決碳排放的一環;希望各國利用核能,趕在2050年前實現碳中和」?

【事實釐清】媒體報導「歐盟主要成員國近日同意將核能納入『綠色轉型』,成為解決碳排放的一環;希望各國利用核能,趕在2050年前實現碳中和」?

https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/2192 

黃其君


✔正常查核程序:
優先翻閱一手資料,若不懂則請教專家
✖ TFC 台灣事實查核中心:
請教(有偏見)專家,也無對專家言論做查對

然後第一個說核能列入歐盟綠色轉型的不是台灣報導也不是哪個擁核媒體平台,是世界最大的媒體通訊社,美聯社以《EU leaders include nuclear energy in green transition》為標題報導歐盟高峰會結論,然後有紐約時報、日本時報等轉載刊登,到台灣因為翻譯就變成歐盟將核能納入綠色轉型。不懂台灣反核怎麼一直說別人世界最大平台假消息呢?

▉美聯社
https://reurl.cc/5gmyV6

范建德老師以2020/01/10的法案文字來認定歐盟要非核,但1/10有好多版本討論,法案文字都不是最終版,反核的還是綠黨提的...裏頭還要求2030歐盟要非核無煤阿...所以最後全部被刪光光也不意外。

▉法案文字
2020/01/15(無反核定案版)
https://reurl.cc/RdNl3Z
2020/01/10(無反核草案)
https://reurl.cc/4gx79v
2020/01/10(反核草案)
https://reurl.cc/Gk1R2v

而台大風險中心趙研究員真的讓你看看什麼叫超譯...

歐盟的技術文件裡提到核能在低碳能源中的重要腳色顯而易見,但確實在風險管理例如核廢料上難以將do no harm排除,很重要的一點,他有表明是因為現階段尚無啟用的核發電燃料的深層處置設施,所以無實例可以做評估。該報告也會在近一步針對核能做詳細討論。

並非像趙研究員說的什麼沒有解方或要隔絕數百萬年...可以不要自己腦補嗎?明明裏投也跟你說有解法了...

▉報告這邊看
https://reurl.cc/9zlYz8

Regarding the long-term management of High-Level Waste (HLW), there is an international consensus that a safe, long-term technical solution is needed to solve the present unsustainable situation. A combination of temporary storage plus permanent disposal in geological formation is the most promising, with some countries are leading the way in implementing those solutions. Yet nowhere in the world has a viable, safe and long-term underground repository been established. It was therefore infeasible for the TEG to undertake a robust DNSH assessment as no permanent, operational disposal site for HLW exists yet from which long-term empirical, in-situ data and evidence to inform such an evaluation for nuclear energy.

Given these limitations, it was not possible for TEG, nor its members, to conclude that the nuclear energy value chain does not cause significant harm to other environmental objectives on the time scales in question. The TEG has not therefore recommended the inclusion of nuclear energy in the Taxonomy at this stage. Further, the TEG recommends that more extensive technical work is undertaken on the DNSH aspects of nuclear energy in future and by a group with in-depth technical expertise on nuclear life cycle technologies and the existing and potential environmental impacts across all objectives.

https://hugo-m9c19ra1o-sueboy.vercel.app/